The top paragraph ignores supply and demand; granted it does have simple merit, but the economy is supposed to be tailored to prevent a simple boost. The issue isn't circulation, its competition. The economy doesn't foster competition because there is no secondary options, there needs to be multiple people selling similar properties for competition to exist and benefit the consumer.
Atleast in your second paragraph it restates the fabricated demand I had been preaching, but you are ignoring that not all new players stay and that old players leave. The issue is not an increased demand (besides the fabricated), but a lock on the supply by those who do not play.
This third paragraph bothers me the most because capitalistic financial systems do not consider creativity nor skill; resellers typically boost a price simply by 2(at cost), which is sensible because a farm isn't the best place to sell produce; here though at cost is much more simplified as the farmer is typically the seller, so prices can be brought down much more and the at cost is just the price of getting the item with time and effort factored in. A loaning agency would allow at cost to be met without this "having money makes money" needing to be a game mechanic. Now it is true that flipping a property without any work doesn't add anything, so an auto appraisal plugin could reprice plots using simple equations and would be very simple to code (one could even factor in blocks by their shop prices), (note: design would be more difficult to equate, unless the program had schematics to consider, but simply importing the size of a region would be fine (and simple)).
