Search results

Staff denying our request does not mean we can't discuss the topic; if anything, it's giving us more reason to discuss this pressing issue.

Wait, wait, wait. Did you just say, "Perhaps just let the guy go?" I think you don't really understand the situation here. Scamming 6 people and not stopping shows that the person isn't just "imperfect", as all of us are. It shows that they honestly don't care much about being sued as they...

If he's not playing anymore, then fine. But if he comes back and starts doing this again, I think he should be banned. I believe that we're misunderstanding each other. See, I think that he should be banned if he comes back AND refuses to work. If he doesn't come back, then, well, apparently...

The ban would be instituted to make a point. Instead of just having to pay money, he would actually lose server time. I guarantee you, bans make you rethink things. As a player who has made many mistakes in the past, and been banned on a good few servers, I can tell you that being banned...

The very reason we're asking for him to be banned is that the staff can't do anything to have him pay us back. Because it looks like we're not getting reimbursed any time soon, we think he should be temporarily banned for, say, 7 days so he doesn't repeat this. If it continues for another two...

For the last time, the issue isn't the scamming. The issue is that it's constant and that the player has no intention of paying the money back. It's unjust and needs to be stopped. However, as the player shows no signs of stopping, I believe that it is time to take action in a different way...

You just said previously that if he never pays you back, then nothing can be done as it's a risk taken with loans. So, if you're not going to be paid back in the first place, why not throw in a ban to make them reconsider their actions?

If you lend someone money, you have every right to be paid back. Period. If that isn't an option, then the player deserves to be banned.

Fair point. But then isn't it sensible to ban people if they scam, say, 4 times in a month? It's unacceptable, and we need to find a solution.

Roses are red Violets are blue Do what you can do Or the server is dead

Actually, they can. Remember, this isn't real life, so they can create money. And besides, if it's your fault for loaning money, then nobody will give loans. That's not optimal, as you may or may not know.

One other thing that bugs me: The staff are noticeably getting exasperated in the court cases, but towards us. Why? What have we done wrong? It's one thing to not ban a player but at least pay attention to the case, but it's another to dismiss it as, "The player has no money, properties or...

A ban should be instituted under the following conditions: A: The player is ruining the atmosphere and player to player trust of the server by -----1: Causing repetitive hinderances to businesses requiring frequent legal action -----2: Scamming despite having no personal possessions, thereby...

Omg I know

Qwikie: Steeeele 2.0.

The devaluation of slimefun items is a worthy price to pay for freedom for new players to experiment with the plugin.

So? Not everyone has to care about slimefun pricing. If the value is lowered, it can simply be attributed to supply in demand. Artificially changing the pricing to benefit large companies doesn't really make any kind of sense, except for of course make the company executives richer. Also...

The point of a military would not be to combat criminals, it would be a /warp that would sell weapons and would allow for cool roleplaying.

How is that relevant? Anybody who left of their free will is welcome, but obviously not people who were perm banned.