... except that it CLEARLY says with the same perks and such, blah blah blah... etc etc etcI provided you with a thread of proof, sorry Mr. President, but you are wrong. He never says things will stay as usual, but states that he can be an honorary founder which means a person who started a company, but conferred as an honor, without the usual requirements or functions.
LOL, sorry death, but this isnt irl, this is in mcYou can all shut up now what you did was illegal anyways.
More proof:
State Law
"Partnerships are governed by the law of the state in which the business operates. Under the law, a general partnership is an entity that operates as the alter ego of the partners involved. Each partner is personally responsible for the actions of the business and the actions of all the other partners. This personal liability and direct agency for the actions of fellow partners means that an outside third party can't be unilaterally substituted for an existing partner. The law protects partners from suddenly finding themselves in partnership with an undesirable person."
http://smallbusiness.chron.com/can-business-partner-sell-consent-74489.html
Here is what turkey said: "You can be honorary founder if you want ! You can have access to all company stuff like usual, but the Fitbit thing made me reconsider what we were actually losing XD ." l https://imgur.com/a/9DHpyI provided you with a thread of proof, sorry Mr. President, but you are wrong. He never says things will stay as usual, but states that he can be an honorary founder which means a person who started a company, but conferred as an honor, without the usual requirements or functions.
I sware what have you become now you try to backstab the company, your not yourself anymore. The elections is turning tables and this is not good. I remember you when you were kind and tried to help out now you try to destroy a company that you and turkey founded together, and by all means was there any COMPANY RULE that allows the party to sell or give , if anything it would have be closest to refer to what I said rather than making up rules right now since Microsoft didn't invent rules nor did McCities have a certain rules for Companies so all of this is illegal, its like saying since no rules we can steal any company we want.LOL, sorry death, but this isnt irl, this is in mc
See you agree to what we filed this for is Turkey and @CP42 can be Co-Owners togetherI sware what have you become now you try to backstab the company, your not yourself anymore. The elections is turning tables and this is not good. I remember you when you were kind and tried to help out now you try to destroy a company that you and turkey founded together, and by all means was there any COMPANY RULE that allows the party to sell or give , if anything it would have be closest to refer to what I said rather than making up rules right now since Microsoft didn't invent rules nor did McCities have a certain rules for Companies so all of this is illegal, its like saying since no rules we can steal any company we want.
That statement means he has access to company properties and assets, but not ownership. Pay attention.Here is what turkey said: "You can be honorary founder if you want ! You can have access to all company stuff like usual, but the Fitbit thing made me reconsider what we were actually losing XD ." l https://imgur.com/a/9DHpy
Did anyone clarify that? Where did both parties agree to those exact rules? No where. And turkey said as usual. Meaning things would stay the sameThat statement means he has access to company properties and assets, but not ownership. Pay attention.
Well technically if cp dosent want it anymore he can hand it to turkey as full owner or they can continue the company togetherSee you agree to what we filed this for is Turkey and @CP42 can be Co-Owners together
Do you want me to tell you the definition of access? I can do this all day.Did anyone clarify that? Where did both parties agree to those exact rules? No where. And turkey said as usual. Meaning things would stay the same
Jezus why are we so skeptical with this stuffDo you want me to tell you the definition of access? I can do this all day.
See you are the only one here worth talking to that is what I am saying I want them to work together but no one will agreeWell technically if cp dosent want it anymore he can hand it to turkey as full owner or they can continue the company together
did you read the previous court case ? Read it wellWell technically if cp dosent want it anymore he can hand it to turkey as full owner or they can continue the company together
Well I mean technically cp dosent want it anymore so might as well give full ownership to turkey, would this bother you, we don't need to argue and we can end this giving turkey the full ownership.See you are the only one here worth talking to that is what I am saying I want them to work together but no one will agree
Cp42 wants to work with Turkey. That's, why he wanted to give up his share because he wants to work with turkey and help, build up Microsoft if both sides can agree on this @PurpleTurkey ?Well I mean technically cp dosent want it anymore so might as well give full ownership to turkey, would this bother you, we don't need to argue and we can end this giving turkey the full ownership.
Huh? Why would he give his share if he wanted to continue working???Cp42 wants to work with Turkey. That's, why he wanted to give up his share because he wants to work with turkey and help, build up Microsoft if both sides can agree on this @PurpleTurkey ?
I didn't say that, I said in my comment that Cp42 can't just handover ownerships either.
Read this one ^You can all shut up now what you did was illegal anyways.
More proof:
State Law
"Partnerships are governed by the law of the state in which the business operates. Under the law, a general partnership is an entity that operates as the alter ego of the partners involved. Each partner is personally responsible for the actions of the business and the actions of all the other partners. This personal liability and direct agency for the actions of fellow partners means that an outside third party can't be unilaterally substituted for an existing partner. The law protects partners from suddenly finding themselves in partnership with an undesirable person."
http://smallbusiness.chron.com/can-business-partner-sell-consent-74489.html
Cp42 owns it 50/50. He gave me his share because he said there is no use to keep it when tiger and turkey tried to isolate the company he created from him ok can we all agree to the following:I didn't say that, I said in my comment that Cp42 can't just handover ownerships either.
Read this one ^